Benefits of outsourcing
Several controversies arose from CEA's February 2004 Economic Report of the President. Economic Report of the President - 2004 In a press conference, Mankiw spoke of the gains from free trade, noting that outsourcing of jobs by U.S. companies is "probably a plus for the economy in the long run." Harvard Econ Department - Contact Info for N. Gregory Mankiw While this reflected mainstream economic analysis, it was criticized by many people on the Republican side of US government who drew a link between outsourcing and the still-slow recovery of the U.S. labor market in early 2004.
Service versus manufacturing
Controversy also arose from a rhetorical question posed by the report (and repeated by Mankiw in a speech about the report): Remarks on the 2004 Economic Report of the President to the National Economists Club and Society of Government Economists "when a fast-food restaurant sells a hamburger, is it providing a service or combining inputs to manufacture a product?" The intended point was that the distinction between manufacturing jobs and service industry jobs is somewhat arbitrary and therefore a poor basis for policy. Even though the issue was not raised in the report, a news account led to criticism that the Administration was seeking to cover up job losses in manufacturing by redefining jobs such as cooking hamburgers as manufacturing.
2008—2009 Keynesian resurgence
In November 2008, Mankiw wrote in the
New York Times:
"If you were going to turn to only one economist to understand the problems facing the economy, there is little doubt that the economist would be John Maynard Keynes. Although Keynes died more than a half-century ago, his diagnosis of recessions and depressions remains the foundation of modern macroeconomics. His insights go a long way toward explaining the challenges we now confront."
Mankiw has expressed skepticism about a trillion dollar spending package in the face of the global financial and economic crisis. He has vigorously criticized Vice-President Joseph Biden for suggesting there was complete unanimity of support among economists for a stimulus package.