Robbie F. reviewed on 2/12/2011 + 21 more book reviews

This book would have been a good book had it not started bass-acwards .... the end of the book should have been the first of the book .... nobody knew WHO Dana Gray was until near the end .... also, the writer spent far too much time on describing dectective Grecco's career, which really didn't have anything to do with the premise of the book, Dana Gray and why she did what she did.

If one can go towards the end of the book to find out WHO Dana Gray was and why she committed these murders (that were described in the first of the book) it would make a whole lot more sense.

To me, the worst a writer can do is waste words (Grecco) and not put together a book in the timely manner of events. It could have been a good book had the author done the above.

Back to all reviews by this member
Back to all reviews of this book
Back to Book Reviews
Back to Book Details