On the other hand, a number of historians refer to this book as a work of fiction. There are enough problems with some of the statements in the book to make many wonder about the rest. At least one historian states that the book should not be "used for the purpose of historical reference."
While Stevenson did contribute to the war effort, it appears he over states his contribution in a number of errors.
It has also been proved one photograph in the book, which is labeled to show Stevenson supposedly walking through rubble with Winston Churchill, is actually that of Lord Beaverbrook.
While Stevenson did contribute to the war effort, it appears he over states his contribution in a number of errors.
It has also been proved one photograph in the book, which is labeled to show Stevenson supposedly walking through rubble with Winston Churchill, is actually that of Lord Beaverbrook.
Back to all reviews by this member
Back to all reviews of this book
Back to Book Reviews
Back to Book Details
Back to all reviews of this book
Back to Book Reviews
Back to Book Details
