Search -
When The She-Wolf Wore Lamb's Clothing/Feminism? Euphemism for Hedonism
When The SheWolf Wore Lamb's Clothing/Feminism Euphemism for Hedonism Author:Frank Writer, Writer Why YOU Should Read When the She-Wolf Wore Lamb's Clothing? If you are a male of any race and have sought employment in an economy that ostensibly opens its arms to you in the name of equal employment opportunity, you need to read the book to confirm what you suspected, that you are expendable, even irrelevant, and now dependent on ... more »the mercy of women who dominate the hiring departments in both the public and private job sectors, women who blame you for patriarchal myths that allegedly oppressed them historically. Using reliable statistics from such sources as the US Department of Labor and the US Census, the author shows how women, from 1984 to 1996, insidiously and dramatically revolted against the so-called white male patriarchy to dominate college enrollment, the employment market, and small business enterprise. He shows how they not only broke the mythological "glass ceiling" but made a "glass house" around their monopoly of the nation's service economy jobs (e.g. health care, education, daycare, finance, high tech), ignoring racial diversity in the process and reverse discriminating against their white brothers whose majority compassion, ironically, empowered women's rights through this country's judicial, executive, and legislative bodies. If you are a military veteran (e.g. World War II, Korea, Vietnam), you need to read the chapter devoted to how feminists have revised America's war annals to take full credit, alongside men, for the successful outcomes of this nation's wars and you need to concede parity to today's generation of women--those females fresh out of college--in terms of the blood sacrifice you and your brothers, in arms, made to this country's military campaigns. You need to wise up, and become aware that the literature coming out of women's studies programs today rewrites history to diminish your role, as male, in America's wars and elevate their role as equally exemplary in stature. This was the rationale behind the taxpayer supported dedication of monuments, the last three years, honoring female war heroes in the District of Columbia's Veterans Memorial Park. No one doubts the contributions of women to war as nurses, communications workers, WACS, WAVES, and in other vital roles. The author gives women credit where credit is due. However, you will come to understand the exaggeration in feminist revisionism and the fact that these revisionists don't appreciate the courage, commitment, or sacrifice of veterans. If you are a minority, an African-American, Hispanic, Asian, or Native-American of either sex, you need to read the book in order to discern why you don't benefit from the civil rights movement, but take a back seat on the bus to affirmative action behind feminists who know nothing about real oppression. You need to understand that your rights to diversity have been subjugated and made subservient to the more pressing needs of these women whose lifestyle choices and career paths are regarded with greater priority than your wants and wishes. You need to understand that in the name of diversity you now share space with strange bedfellows who never experienced your discrimination and who, ironically, are descendants of your oppressors; the Scarlet O'Haras' of society who benefited during America's days of slavery and segregation. Furthermore, the book reveals that feminists regard their oppression as more important than the historical experience of African-Americans, Hispanics, and native-Americans. The author discovers how the pioneers of the feminist movement--Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton--actively opposed the emancipation of black slaves in preference to their own rights. If you are a male and find yourself the recipient of a sexual harassment complaint at work, When the She-Wolf Wore Lamb's Clothing will open your eyes to just how frivolous most accusations are and how the definition of harassment has been purposely expanded, over the years, to include a look, off-color remarks, innocent jokes, simple compliments, sounds, or even your demeanor. You will come to realize that sexual harassment laws are designed to keep you under control in a majority women's work environment that is defined as non-hostile as long as you behave yourself. You will come to see how women conversely, and simultaneously, play their traditional sex games unhindered and their actions in teasing, taunting, and flirting with men are devoid of legal consequences. You will discover that there is no dual accountability because sexual harassment laws were originally crafted by extremist female lawyers who purposely worded statutes ambiguously to facilitate sweeping interpretations of charges brought forth by women complainants and molded to suit their needs as accusers. Sexual harassment is simply a woman's puritanical notion of what she perceives to be offensive on the receiving end as defined by her thought process and tailored to her motivation in making the allegation. Its anything which assists her in achieving vindication for a perceived wrong done earlier to her (i.e. passed over for a promotion, not given a preferred job, yelled at or disciplined for incompetence or non-performance), a vehicle which gives her competitive control over her male working peers, a contrivance which allows her to get back at her gender enemies ("a woman scorned"), and ever increasingly a conduit which provides her money in the form of a lawsuit settlement levied against her employer. If you have an argument or physical altercation with your girlfriend, spouse, or a woman in traffic, and find yourself arrested upon the arrival of police in response to her "911" emergency call, you will finally "get it" that violence at home or elsewhere is violence against women only. Never mind that she might get in your face, use profanity in arguing with you, use fighting words to provoke you, push you, shove you, punch you, chronically criticize you, or even physically assault you. Never mind that women, statistically, murder their children more than men and that men are the target of violent crime more than 4 to 1 as compared to women victims. But just as with sexual harassment, women act with immunity. Just as with sexual harassment, the law is only designed to protect the woman, not the man. You have no liability insurance in a politically-correct society that only condemns your perceived misbehavior at home and in the work place, and condones hers. Read the book and ruminate over feminism when you experience a romantic date, engage in what you think is consensual intercourse, and discover that your lover has second thoughts "the morning after" or doubts concerning her hasty decision to be intimate in the "heat of passion" (what she assesses to be her poor judgment in selecting you as an illegitimate sex partner). She might, in retrospect, size you up as a predator who compelled her to do what she did because you allegedly placed something in her drink, persuaded her to drink excessively, or broke down her will with repeated attempts at seduction. If she decides that going to bed with you was a mistake and she needs an excuse for her decision to "date" you, she can accuse you of date rape--rape used to be forcible, physical and violent; now all it has to be is unwanted sex in hindsight from the woman's perspective--and you go off to prison on a felony conviction. And just as is the case with sexual harassment and domestic violence laws, she can falsely accuse you and not have to worry about legal ramifications, reprisals, or repercussions because she is immune from prosecution, scrutiny, or investigation. Society assumes her integrity--never mind her suspect veracity or sexual past--and her motives are never questioned therefore. Charlton Heston the great actor of Ten Commandments fame, says, "Mainstream America is depending on you, counting on you, to draw your sword and fight for them. These people have precious little time or resources to battle misguided Cinderella attitudes . . . the feminists who preach that it's a divine duty for women to hate men . . . and all the New-Age apologists. We've reached that point in time when our national social policy originates on Oprah. I say its time to pull the plug . . . Americans should not have to go to war every morning for their values. They fight to hold down a job, raise reasonable kids, make their payments, keep gas in the car, put food on the table and clothes on their backs, and still save a little for their final days in dignity. They prefer the America they built--where you could pray without feeling naive, love without being kinky, sing without profanity . . . and raise your hand without apology. In a cultural war, triump belongs to those who arm themselves with pride in who they are and then do the right thing. Not the most expedient thing, not the politically correct thing, not what'll sell, but the right thing . . . Don't run for cover when the cultural cannons roar. Remember who you are and what you believe, and then raise your hand, stand up, and speak out. Don't be shamed or startled into lockstep conformity by seemingly powerful people. The maintenance of a free nation is a long, slow, steady process. And it is in your hands." [Source: Potomac Institute's Internet Web-site, From a speech delivered by Charlton Heston, National Rifle Association President, on December 7, 1997 at the "Free Congress Foundation's 20th Anniversary Gala" and then reiterated by Mr. Heston at the "National Constitution Day Banquet" of December 24, 1998 broadcast on C-SPAN (audio tapes sold to the public).] To make it clear, When The She-Wolf Wore Lamb's Clothing is not an anti-woman book, nor one which espouses animosity towards the female gender. Instead, it is a book which fully supports the protection of women's rights where women are clearly abused (truly egregious cases of rape, domestic violence, sexual harassment). It also advocates equal employment opportunity for all women, but opposes preferential treatment (affirmative action) as a job guarantor for one vested interest group. To reiterate, When The She-Wolf Wore Lamb's Clothing is not an exercise in misogyny but asks for a level playing field or objectivity, balance and fairness with respect to accusations of sexual harassment, domestic violence, and date rape against men. It dispels the myth of revisionist history that paints a picture of historical and economic gender oppression. Instead, the book highlights the achievements of women of accomplishment as a legacy unmatched by today's chic-feminist obsessed with image and empowerment through her own sexuality.« less