In Dublin Swift was already writing articles for art magazines such as Envoy (
Nano Reid, Envoy, March 1950;
The Artist Speaks, Envoy, Feb 1951) and The Bell. In the 1952 Time magazine article on Swift it mentions that he admired "such moderns as Switzerland's Alberto Giacometti and Britain's Francis Bacon". Giacometti´s work he must have got to know while in Paris in 1949/50, and possibly Bacon too, though its more likely Swift knew Bacon from his previous visits to London. Giacometti was beginning to build a reputation but the mention of Bacon, says the critic Brian Fallon, "is quite remarkable. He had, in the early fifties, a mere coterie reputation, and was generally regarded as an isolated and rather fringe figureVery few were prepared to concede that he was a modern master." Swift´s essay ‘Some notes on Caravaggio’, written during his stay in Italy in 1954/5, appeared in Nimbus (London) in 1956.
X magazine"We were out to provide a platform for the individual vision, not accepted avant-gardisme or second-hand attitudes."
- David Wright
In London he founded and edited - with the poet David Wright - ´
the brilliant but short-live quarterly 'X
' ( Cambridge paperback guide to literature in English), A Quarterly Review of Literature and the Arts, for which Swift wrote articles on art under the pseudonym ‘James Mahon’ (Swift´s mother was a Mahon from Co. Wicklow; Wicklow is the setting of his last, unfinished, painting of an elderly couple holding a baby Image). X promoted and obtained contributions from many leading artists of that period including Francis Bacon, Frank Auerbach, Alberto Giacometti, Lucian Freud, Leon Kossoff, Oskar Kokoschka, André Masson, Michael Andrews, Roberts MacBryde and Colquhoun, Craigie Atchison, Vernon Watkins, Malcolm Lowry, Samuel Beckett, Robert Pinget, Patrick Kavanagh, Martin Gerard, Ezra Pound, Stevie Smith, W.H. Auden, René Daumal, David Gascoyne, George Barker, Anthony Cronin, John Heath-Stubbs, Hugh MacDiarmid, John Jordan, Martin Seymour-Smith, Ted Hughes, Robert Graves, Philippe Jaccottet, Jules Supervielle, Yves Bonnefoy, Timothy Behrens, C. H. Sisson David Wright in his introduction to An Anthology from X: "X, a quarterly review of literature and the arts, flourished, or at any rate existed, between the years 1959 and 1962. It took its name from the algebraic symbol for the unknown quantity- ‘incalculable or mysterious fact or influence’ as the Concise Oxford Dictionary defines it. Neither manifesto nor editorial introduced the first number: its contents were the manifesto...The true begetter and leading light of X was Patrick Swift...
Swift was, of course, responsible for the art side of the magazine. These were the boom years of abstract art. Swift, twenty years ahead of his time, launched a series of penetrating attacks on the cult as well as promoting the work of then unknown or unfashionable figurative painters, among them the young Frank Auerbach, Michael Andrews, and Craigie Aitchison, and such as-yet uncannonized painters as Lucien Freud, Francis Bacon, and the forgotten David Bomberg. Examples of their work were reproduced; more importantly, it was Swift's idea that the artist should speak for themselves, which was achieved either by transcribing their tape-recorded conversation (not 'interviews', wherein questions loaded with some obtuse interogator's 'impercipience' tend to darken council), or by publishing their notes. Swifts’s unearthing and editing of David Bomberg’s outspoken and apocalyptic pensées, scattered about his miscellaneous papers, was an outstanding contribution."And in an interview with
Poetry Nation: "I received a letter from the Irish painter Patrick Swift inviting me to come in with him to edit a new quarterly. The backing was to come via the remarkable Mrs St John Hutchinson. The actual backer I was never to meet [ Michael Berry/ Lord Hartwell, proprietor of the Daily Telegraph ], but through his generosity X was able to pay contributors on the scale of Encounter. The first number came out at the end of 1959, the seventh and last in 1962."
Martin Green (writer, editor and publisher) writing in The Independent. “ [X] promoted the work of then unfashionable writers and poets, including Stevie Smith, Hugh MacDiarmid, Patrick Kavanagh and Malcolm Lowry, and discussed the work of similarly unfashionable artists..."
Michael Schmidt (founder of Carcanet Press, editor of Poetry Nation Review and Professor of Poetry at the University of Glasgow) in The Guardian, 2006:
" David Wright's and Patrick Swift's legendary X set the common agenda for a generation of European painters, writers and dramatists. "
John McGahern: For John McGahern an extract from 'The End or Beginning of Love' which was reproduced in X was his first time in print and it led to a publishing deal: "I wrote a first novel with a pretentious title, The End or Beginning of Love. A friend was interested in it, Jimmy Swift, who was also responsible for getting Patrick Kavanagh into print at the time, liked it and sent it to his brother, Patrick Swift, who was editing a magazine called X in London with the poet David Wright. They liked it and published an extract. That was my first time in print. The magazine was influential, though, like most magazines of the kind, it was short lived. Many painters, like Francis Bacon, Lucian Freud, Frank Auerbach, Michael Andrews, wrote for the magazine. I met these people when the magazine invited me to London. I was in my early twenties. I had very little experience of the world and found the bohemian lives around Soho fairly alarming. The extract in X attracted interest from a number of publishers. Fabers, among other publishers, wrote to me. T. S. Eliot was working at the firm then." In his essay 'The Bird Swift' McGahern noted that Swift mentioned, as they walked around the Mayfair galleries in the summer of 1960, that he admired L. S. Lowry and that anyone who could afford to buy a Lowry would make a fortune. There is an interesting RTÉ radio podcast on Swift and McGahern.
Patrick Kavanagh: Swift loved and promoted Patrick Kavanagh (John Ryan noted that Swift introduced the more autumnal Kavanagh to the work of W.H.Auden which, says Ryan, changed the older man's entire approach to poetry ). Swift was responsible for Kavanagh appearing in Nimbus in 1956, as David Wright who was then editor says:"
These poems [19 of Kavanagh's poems were published]
had been posted to me by Swift, whose brother James had invaded the poet's flat in Dublin, gathered up the trampled manuscripts scattered about the floor, and had them sorted, typed, and bound. One of the carbon copies was sent to me. " Antoinette Quinn, however, in her biography of Patrick Kavanagh, says that the idea of Jimmy Swift invading the poet's flat is a myth. She states that Kavanagh had a typescript rejected by Macmillan's and that, subsequently, Swift, on one of his trips to Dublin, " was invited to peruse the contents and decided that the poems should be published. He had to returned to Londonbut persuaded Kavanagh to entrust the precious typescript to his brother, Jimmy, to have three copies professionally typed up...[Jimmy,] acting under his brothers instructions...sent one copy each to David Wright and Martin Green in London. " Quinn is, no doubt, correct with her version of events, though it must be said that Wright's is the more amusing- and no doubt the story put out by Swift himself, and one which, we can assume, would not have displeased Kavanagh. Antoinette Quinn goes on to say that " Publication there [In Nimbus] was to prove a turning pointThe publication of his next volume of verse,
Come Dance with Kitty Stobling, was to be directly linked to the mini-collection in
Nimbus, and his
Collected Poems (1964)..." And Martin Green , who put together the first collection of Kavanagh's poems for MacGibbon and Kee, acknowledges:
"it was following the suggestion of the painter Patrick Swift and the poet Anthony Cronin that the publication came about.". Regarding their friendship, Antoinette Quinn says: " Swift believed in his genius and indulged him and...the older man...came to lean on Swift as a beloved nephew." Kavanagh would often stay with Swift and his family at Westbourne Terrace.
Brian Fallon in his essay on Swift:
“[X was] a remarkable publication which, in some respects, was light years ahead of its time...Swift's criticism is that of the practicing artist not that of a practicing critic, and when speaking of his criticism I do not merely mean only his occasional critical essays, but his activity as co-editor of a magazine and as champion of Bacon, Freud, Auerbach, Craig Atchison, Nano Reid, Giacometti and David Bomberg (whose posthumous papers he edited).This is criticism in the valid, active , propagandistic sense, not merely the daily or weekly grind of reviewing all sorts and conditions of artists, good and bad, but mostly mediocre. Once again much of Swift's activity in this field was semi-underground, almost subversive, often done in the teeth of the modernist establishment of his day. His record in this field speaks for itself....I cannot think of any other Irish painter who achieved anything like what he did as a critic and editor and discoverer of talent, and very few painters in any other country either. Wyndham Lewis, it is true, was a verbose propagandist, but on the whole he was a bad critic, and somehow his propaganda almost always turns out to be some form of self-aggrandisement, whereas Swift almost always pushed the fortunes and reputations of his friends and almost never his own. Yet, you do not get, from his general stance, that his motives were simply friendship and good intentions. There is a tone of dedication throughout, as though he was serving art, and not merely artists.
It is a peculiarity of his very individual psyche and personality that Swift cannot be ‘placed’ purely as a painter. He was an artist in the broad sense before he was specifically a painter, and his context embraces literature and other disciplines besides painting or drawing (It is noticeable that he had more friends who were literary men than friends who were painters). Swift is not a painter’s painter, he is an artist’s artist, a man whose mentality overlapped into other fields besides his own chosen one.”