Ellis returned to England in April 1879. He had decided to take up the study of sex, and felt his first step must be to qualify as a medical man. He studied at St Thomas's Hospital Medical School, but never had a regular medical practice. His training was aided by a small legacy and also income earned from editing works in the Mermaid Series of lesser known Elizabethan and Jacobean drama. He joined The Fellowship of the New Life in 1883, meeting other social reformers Edward Carpenter and George Bernard Shaw.
The first English medical text book on homosexuality is the 1897 English translation of Ellis' book
Sexual Inversion, co-authored with John Addington Symonds and originally published in German in 1896. It describes the sexual relations of homosexual men and boys, something that Ellis did not consider to be a disease, immoral, or a crime. The work assumes that same-sex love transcended age-taboos as well as gender-taboos, as seven of the twenty-one examples are of intergenerational relationships. A bookseller was prosecuted in 1897 for stocking Ellis' book. Although the term
homosexual itself is attributed to Ellis, he wrote in 1897, “‘homosexual’ is a barbarously hybrid word, and I claim no responsibility for it,” Online Etymology Dictionary at www.etymonline.com the hybridity in question being the word's mix of Greek and Latin roots. Other psychologically important concepts developed by Ellis include autoerotism and narcissism, both of which were later taken up by Sigmund Freud.
Ellis also studied what we call today transgender phenomena. Alongside Magnus Hirschfeld, Havelock Ellis is regarded as the other major figure in the history of sexology responsible for establishing a new category that was separate and distinct from homosexuality. Aware of Hirschfeld's studies of transvestism, but unhappy with Hirschfeld terminology, in 1913 Ellis proposed the term
sexo-aesthetic inversion to describe the phenomenon. Still unhappy with this, in 1920 he coined the term
eonism, which he derived from the name of a historical figure, Chevalier d'Eon, just like sadism and masochism had been derived. Ellis explained:
- :"On the psychic side, as I view it, the Eonist is embodying, in an extreme
- :degree, the aesthetic attitude of imitation of, and identification with,
- :the admired object. It is normal for a man to identify himself with the
- :woman he loves. The Eonist carries that identification too far, stimulated by a
- :sensitive and feminine element in himself which is associated with a rather
- :defective virile sexuality on what may be a neurotic basis."
Ellis found eonism to be "a remarkably common anomaly", and "next in frequency to homosexuality among sexual deviations", and categorized it as "among the transitional or intermediate forms of sexuality." In Freudian tradition, Ellist also postulated that a "too close attachment to the mother" may encourage eonism, but also considered that it "probably invokes some defective endocrine balance".
Nowadays, his notion of eonism has been abandoned in favor of autogynephilia, a term with a simpler definition coined by Ray Blanchard.