Helpful Score: 5
First Line: "Shit, Blackie, this one's dead, too."
In this, her sixteenth outing, National Park Service ranger Anna Pigeon is still recuperating from the events of Winter Study and Borderline. While her husband, Paul, keeps on working, Anna stays with a friend in post-Katrina New Orleans, little knowing that she's soon going to be fighting for what's right out in the concrete jungle.
While staying in one of her friend's apartments, Anna sees the creepy Jordan, a bartender by night and a "gutter punk" by day. Observing some of Jordan's behavior, Anna comes to believe he's a pedophile. But Jordan is not what he seems, and his connection to Clare Sullivan, an actress whose family was murdered in Seattle, is at the very heart of Barr's powerful plot.
If I'd known how good this book was, I would've kissed Barr when I attended her author signing at a local bookstore. For some reason, I caught on almost immediately to one of Barr's surprises, and I was able to gobble this book up at a fast clip. (In comparison, my husband was listening to the audio version and was confused. When I ascertained that he was within a very few pages of the reveal, I clued him in, and he settled down to enjoy the book, too.)
Anna isn't all that much different in the wilds of New Orleans as she is out in the middle of a national park, as you can see from her thoughts on the local "gutter punks":
"These kids were not her brand of criminal. She wasn't well versed in their migration patterns, did not know their natural habitat, what they preyed upon or what preyed upon them-- but people who valued fear and enjoyed pain were scary. Healthy animals, bunnies and foxes and cougars and grizzlies, ran from what frightened them and avoided pain at all costs. When they stopped behaving this way it was because they were sick, rabid."
Anna may not be in Kansas anymore, but her observations are finely tuned.
A word of warning: this book deals honestly and in some detail with the loathsome subject of child sexual abuse and pornography. Did I enjoy the subject matter? No. Did I secretly harbor a tiny little wish that Anna was in a park keeping visitors away from the bears? Yes, for a few pages. However, one of the most important things I've loved about the character of Anna Pigeon throughout sixteen books is that she constantly evolves as a person.
At the beginning of the series, she fought for what she believed in, but if she could get away with staying away from people, that's what she would do. She's kicked her dependence on alcohol, she's learned to trust another human enough to fall in love and marry, she's knowingly coming to the end of her career, and she's still brave enough to fight-- and in fact she puts more of her heart into the battle than she ever did before.
In Burn, Anna found herself in a situation that literally made her sick, but children needed her desperately, and she refused to turn her back. You can't ask for better than that.
Imagine my surprise when I went to Amazon to check out the reviews for what I believe to be an excellent book, and found that it was rated 2.5 stars out of 5. Why? The subject matter.
"There's so much ugliness in the world today that I refuse to read about it for fun."
There's a lot of truth to that statement; however, I can't help but feel that many of these people turning up their noses at Barr's choice of subject matter in this book would also turn their heads and refuse to see when confronted face-to-face with the actual horror. (It's so nasty and uncomfortable, don't you know?)
I read most of the reviews, and it seemed to boil down to a consumer's version of Tough Love: Write about what I want you to write about, or I won't buy your books. I want blue skies and sunshine and cute animals!
Fair enough. I'm happy to let everyone read what they want, as long as I get to do the same. I'll continue to enjoy Anna's evolution as a character wherever she may roam, and I won't tell y'all that Anna will be at Lake Powell the next time she appears. I'll keep all that azure water, sky and sunshine to myself. I don't know about the cute animals, though. I've seen plenty of birds, fish and lizards at Lake Powell....
In this, her sixteenth outing, National Park Service ranger Anna Pigeon is still recuperating from the events of Winter Study and Borderline. While her husband, Paul, keeps on working, Anna stays with a friend in post-Katrina New Orleans, little knowing that she's soon going to be fighting for what's right out in the concrete jungle.
While staying in one of her friend's apartments, Anna sees the creepy Jordan, a bartender by night and a "gutter punk" by day. Observing some of Jordan's behavior, Anna comes to believe he's a pedophile. But Jordan is not what he seems, and his connection to Clare Sullivan, an actress whose family was murdered in Seattle, is at the very heart of Barr's powerful plot.
If I'd known how good this book was, I would've kissed Barr when I attended her author signing at a local bookstore. For some reason, I caught on almost immediately to one of Barr's surprises, and I was able to gobble this book up at a fast clip. (In comparison, my husband was listening to the audio version and was confused. When I ascertained that he was within a very few pages of the reveal, I clued him in, and he settled down to enjoy the book, too.)
Anna isn't all that much different in the wilds of New Orleans as she is out in the middle of a national park, as you can see from her thoughts on the local "gutter punks":
"These kids were not her brand of criminal. She wasn't well versed in their migration patterns, did not know their natural habitat, what they preyed upon or what preyed upon them-- but people who valued fear and enjoyed pain were scary. Healthy animals, bunnies and foxes and cougars and grizzlies, ran from what frightened them and avoided pain at all costs. When they stopped behaving this way it was because they were sick, rabid."
Anna may not be in Kansas anymore, but her observations are finely tuned.
A word of warning: this book deals honestly and in some detail with the loathsome subject of child sexual abuse and pornography. Did I enjoy the subject matter? No. Did I secretly harbor a tiny little wish that Anna was in a park keeping visitors away from the bears? Yes, for a few pages. However, one of the most important things I've loved about the character of Anna Pigeon throughout sixteen books is that she constantly evolves as a person.
At the beginning of the series, she fought for what she believed in, but if she could get away with staying away from people, that's what she would do. She's kicked her dependence on alcohol, she's learned to trust another human enough to fall in love and marry, she's knowingly coming to the end of her career, and she's still brave enough to fight-- and in fact she puts more of her heart into the battle than she ever did before.
In Burn, Anna found herself in a situation that literally made her sick, but children needed her desperately, and she refused to turn her back. You can't ask for better than that.
Imagine my surprise when I went to Amazon to check out the reviews for what I believe to be an excellent book, and found that it was rated 2.5 stars out of 5. Why? The subject matter.
"There's so much ugliness in the world today that I refuse to read about it for fun."
There's a lot of truth to that statement; however, I can't help but feel that many of these people turning up their noses at Barr's choice of subject matter in this book would also turn their heads and refuse to see when confronted face-to-face with the actual horror. (It's so nasty and uncomfortable, don't you know?)
I read most of the reviews, and it seemed to boil down to a consumer's version of Tough Love: Write about what I want you to write about, or I won't buy your books. I want blue skies and sunshine and cute animals!
Fair enough. I'm happy to let everyone read what they want, as long as I get to do the same. I'll continue to enjoy Anna's evolution as a character wherever she may roam, and I won't tell y'all that Anna will be at Lake Powell the next time she appears. I'll keep all that azure water, sky and sunshine to myself. I don't know about the cute animals, though. I've seen plenty of birds, fish and lizards at Lake Powell....
Helpful Score: 3
Anna Pigeon is at her ethical and crusading best in this novel. When she decides to spend some leave in New Orleans with her friend, Geneva, she meets Jordan, a strange-looking creepy guy who turns out to be Clare, a woman sought for the murders of her husband, two children and his mistress. The trouble is that Clare, an excellent actress, doesn't remember doing it and has retreated in the character of Jordan, a young male who survives no matter what. Anna believes Clare and the two set out to find the missing children. What they uncover is violence, more death and child prostitution. The book is exciting and flows well; the murders are quite graphic as are the pornographic scenes. The book deals with child prostitution and gives observation pornographic details that I could do without. However, Anna is a heroine I really like and her dilemmas are always realistic. How much should she reveal to her new husband, Paul, without damaging the relationship between herself and the man she loves.
Helpful Score: 2
Burn takes Anna Pigeon out of her usual outdoor national park settings and places her in an urban national park in New Orleans. As Anna tries to recuperate from extremely stressful occurrences as a park ranger, she stays with a friend, Geneva, an interpretive ranger who sings Jazz. Anna can't help but get caught up in the life of a mysterious young man who has become Geneva's tenant. This is one of Nevada Barr's best novels. I highly recommend it.
Helpful Score: 1
I've read all of the Anna Pigeon books in order. This is Nevada Barr's latest in this series. Unlike the others, this story dealt with a far darker plot. The story started out from the POV of the secondary characters. I initially found the characters weak and not particularly compelling and the first many chapters switched POV and threads so much it was hard to follow. Nearly put the book down at that point. In fact the story didn't get off the ground until well after page 100! But, knowing the excellent storytelling ability of Ms. Barr, I continued reading. And then it got good. All the disparate threads came together and wow! The other female character morphed into memorable. Good read. Couldn't put it down.
Another nice story from Nevada.
Her books are always interesting and different. This is set in New Orleans.
Holy moly - such a good book. Much better than her previous book. This sings with mystery, drama, and suspense. It's gritty and nasty (subject matter) and I found myself not wanting to stop reading.
I had trouble with "Hard Truth" (Anna Pigeon series) because of the child abuse, but that was nothing compared to the horrendous, disgusting, detailed descriptions of child trafficking and sexual abuse by pedophiles in "Burn." The last two books that I read by Barr were not up to her usual excellence, but I reread the first ten Pigeon novels and "Bittersweet" (by Barr) because I enjoyed them so much. "Burn" was given me as a gift and I was hoping that this book would be up to her earlier writing style. I was disappointed, again. I gave the book two stars because no one can dispute the author's ability to weave a tale or her unparalleled gift of stringing words together in beautiful prose. That being said, I have worked with adults who were abused and sexually molested as children. I do acknowledge that people need to be made aware of this very real sickness that lurks in the most unsuspected places in our societies...worldwide. However, I don't think a novel written with such lurid detail is the way to do it. One reviewer pointed out that parts of this book might even appeal to pedophiles due to the vivid descriptions. I read for entertainment because I have to deal with the ugliness of the "real" world everyday. I do not care to encounter that ugliness while reading for fun. Perhaps there is a good reason to write books like "Burn." If one person is so touched by the book that they are motivated to work toward a solution to the problem, then who am I to say that it should not be written.
I would not recommend the book; you need to judge for yourself if this book is for you.
I would not recommend the book; you need to judge for yourself if this book is for you.
I didn't much care for this book--if you can wade through all the descriptions on every page and dig out the story line it would cut out about 1/2 the book, you can scan down through the pages and pick out what you need to get on with the story and forget all the descriptions that are unnecessary. As for the storyline--if you can watch CSI Las Vegas and the disgusting stories they have on it or watch Law & Order SVU with all the storylines of rape, pedophiles, sick sick people in this world then you can read this book, it is only the about the last 100 pages that really get into the worst part of descriptions but if you can handle the CSI & SVU stories this won't effect you any different than those shows.
Each person will just have to be the judge.
Each person will just have to be the judge.
I normally would give a Nevada Barr book a 4 or 5 star review because I like the Anna Pigeon character - her intelligence, her initiative, her strengths, her humanity - and have read all of the books in the series. This book, however, was extremely difficult for me to read. For one thing, I'm not particularly interested in voodoo. it's been overdone, in my opinion, in too many books and, with Anna back in New Orleans, it's a part of this story. That aside, the child sex slavery part of this story, particularly focused on such young children, had me putting the book down numerous times, determined not to finish it. This particular deviance, loathsome as it is and apparently very much on the rise around the world and in the U.S, tends to make me despise men in general and, of course, the women who help them. Of course, realistically I know that most men don't succumb to that part of their psyche that desires such travesties; however, the idea that the possibility is there is distasteful. Off my soapbox now: the writing is great, as usual, and I did finish the book to find out 1) how Anna survived, and @) whether the mother ever finds her two little girls. Anymore and I'll give away too much of the plot.
